Definitive list dating offenses

Other cases involving battery follow the same line of interpretation.In this instance, the INS contends that the battery is a crime of violence under INA §101(a)(43)(F).In that case, the alien was a permanent resident of the United States with two U. She was ordered to confinement for twelve months and her sentence was probated with an additional condition that if she paid a fine of 0.00 the probation would be dismissed. In fact, she paid the fine in two months and her probation was dismissed shortly thereafter.Since she had been a legal permanent resident over eight years, in 1995, she applied for U. citizenship and was administratively approved by the Immigration & Naturalization (INS).On the surface, IIRAIRA appears to settle the issue of retroactivity of the definition of aggravated felony.This issue remains alive and will highly be contested by aliens.The legislation had resounding bi-partisan backing and passed without incident.However, an immigration portion of the bill was included in AEDPA much the same way as ADAA introduced the term aggravated felony into immigration law.

The INS contends that she is an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(G) and even though there was no incarceration and a total suspension of her sentence.A recent decision by the BIA held that an alien convicted of aggravated driving under the influence pursuant to an Arizona statute is an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(F).The alien was sentenced to two and half years to imprisonment.On the other hand, IIRAIRA was the end product and genesis of the controversial proposition "187" in California.Like a match on a single twig exploding into a massive brush fire, the issue of legal and illegal immigration became blurred and heightened xenophobia was prevalent as IIRAIRA was passed.

Leave a Reply